20+ Years Experience

Specialist Insolvency Practitioners

Licensed Insolvency Practitioners

Insolvency Practitioners Nationwide

When a company faces financial difficulties and insolvency, exploring the available options for resolving the situation becomes crucial.

Liquidation and administration are two prominent procedures that companies may consider, each with its own distinct characteristics and implications.

Understanding the differences between liquidation and administration is essential for company directors, stakeholders, and creditors alike in order to make informed decisions regarding the future of the business.

In this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive comparison between liquidation and administration, shedding light on the key features, processes, and implications of each.

By exploring these two insolvency procedures, we seek to equip readers with the knowledge necessary to navigate the complexities of corporate insolvency and choose the most appropriate path for their unique circumstances.

Understanding Liquidation and Administration

Liquidation and administration are two distinct insolvency procedures, each with its own objectives, processes, outcomes, and consequences.

While liquidation primarily, liquidation aims to bring a company to an end, administration seeks to save it from collapse.

The processes and procedures involved in these options differ significantly, with liquidation focusing on asset sales and dissolution, and administration involving an insolvency practitioner taking control and making tough decisions.

Ultimately, the outcomes and consequences of each procedure vary, with liquidation ending a company’s operations and administration potentially leading to a complete business recovery plan.

Liquidation Basics

Liquidation is the process of dissolving a company due to its inability to pay its debts, resulting in the sale of its assets to satisfy creditors.

There are three main types of liquidation: Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL), Compulsory Liquidation, and Members’ Voluntary Liquidation (MVL).

In a CVL, a licensed insolvency practitioner oversees the liquidation of a company’s assets and the conclusion of its operations. In an MVL, an other licensed insolvency practitioner also assists in the sale of the company assets, and ensures that any debts are paid off before profits are distributed.

On the other hand, compulsory liquidation involves the Insolvency Service investigating directors, and company creditors who may be held responsible for outstanding debts if their actions are deemed fraudulent or contrary to the company’s interests.

Administration Basics

Administration is a procedure aimed at protecting a company from insolvency by transferring control of its operations and decision-making processes to a professional insolvency practitioner (the administrator).

The administrator’s goal going concern is to improve the business, satisfy its liabilities, repay creditors, and ultimately regain profitability.

During the administration process, a company enters a 12-month period under the control of an appointed administrator, who has the authority to make operational decisions and possibly continue trading if a viable core business is present.

One notable form of administration is Pre-Pack Administration, which involves valuing assets and negotiating sales before the appointment of the administrator.

As a result, the underlying business, is sold as a going concern, often to existing directors who continue to run the underlying business themselves.

The Key Differences Between Liquidation and Administration

In summary, the primary differences between liquidation and administration lie in their objectives and goals, processes and procedures, and outcomes and consequences.

Liquidation seeks to close down a company completely by selling its assets and distributing the proceeds to creditors, while administration aims to save a company and restore it to profitability.

Liquidation involves asset sales and dissolution, whereas administration requires an insolvency practitioner to assume control and make difficult decisions.

The results of these procedures also vary, with liquidation ending a company’s existence and administration potentially leading to a more complete, recovery plan and business revival.

Objectives and Goals

The main objective of liquidation is to terminate a company by liquidating its assets and using the proceeds to either pay creditors, back creditors and shareholders. This process avoid liquidation effectively brings the company to an end.

In contrast, the primary objective of administration is to attempt to rescue a company suffering from financial or operational difficulties, with the ultimate goal of restoring profitability.

In some cases, administration may also be used to provide returns to preferential or secured creditors or to deliver a more advantageous outcome than if the company was liquidated.

This highlights the one key difference and primary difference in objectives and goals between liquidation and administration: one seeks to end a company, while the other strives to save it.

Processes and Procedures

In liquidation, the process avoid liquidation involves the sale of a company’s assets and its dissolution. The outcome company liquidated is the winding up of the company, with the subsequent sale of company assets to pay creditors before the company is removed from the Companies House register. This process ultimately results in liquidation follow the termination of the company.

On the other hand, the administration process involves an insolvency practitioner taking control of a company’s operations and decision-making processes.

Their goal is to get sufficient funds to stabilise the struggling business again, pay off its debts, and ultimately return it to profitability. The administration process is focused on preserving the company, in contrast to the liquidation process which seeks to bring it to an end.

Outcomes and Consequences

The outcomes and consequences of company liquidation and administration differ significantly. In liquidation, the company is dissolved, its assets are sold, and it ceases to exist.

This procedure is typically the final step in a company’s life, with no possibility of future recovery or continuation.

In contrast, if successful, company administration can result in the full recovery of the business. The company can be restructured, fulfill its obligations, avoid insolvency, and continue trading.

This offers a more hopeful outcome for struggling businesses, with the potential for a fresh start and future success.

The Role of Insolvency Practitioners

Insolvency practitioners play a critical role in both creditors voluntary liquidation, and administration of formal insolvency processes themselves. They are the professional team responsible for overseeing the entire insolvency procedure, and ensuring that creditors’ interests are met.

Their expertise and guidance can significantly impact the outcome of the process, making it essential to choose the right insolvency practitioner for your company’s specific needs.

Responsibilities and Duties

Insolvency practitioners have a wide range of responsibilities in both liquidation and administration.

They provide professional advice to avoid insolvency, negotiate with creditors and other parties, realise assets, collect debts, and maximise returns for creditors.

Additionally, they may be appointed as administrators, liquidators, nominees, or supervisors in various forms of company insolvency.

In the context of insolvent company liquidation, insolvency practitioners oversee the liquidation of a company’s assets and the conclusion of its operations.

In administration, they assume full control of a company’s operations and decision-making processes, with the aim of stabilising the business, paying off its debts, and ultimately returning to profitability. Their role is essential in achieving the desired outcome for both processes.

Choosing the Right Insolvency Practitioner

Selecting the right insolvency practitioner for your company is crucial for the success of the liquidation or administration process.

Factors to consider when choosing an insolvency practitioner include their expertise, communication abilities, reliability, and accessibility.

Qualifications, fees, and proposed procedures for your business should also be considered.

When seeking expert advice, it is important to ensure your questions are articulated in a precise and straightforward manner. Be courteous and respectful when contacting an expert, and be prepared to provide compensation for their services if necessary.

The right insolvency practitioner will be able to offer the most suitable advice and guidance to guarantee the most favorable result for all parties involved.

Legal Aspects of Liquidation and Administration

Legal aspects of liquidation and administration include the moratorium, which prevents creditors from taking legal action in the administration period but not in liquidation, and director investigations and liability, which may be required in the liquidation process but not in the full administration and liquidation period.

Understanding these legal aspects is crucial for company directors to make informed decisions about the most suitable insolvency process for their business.

Moratorium and Creditor Protection

The moratorium of creditors is a legal mechanism that prevents creditors from taking legal action against a company in administration.

This period of respite from creditors is a key benefit of the administration process, as it allows the company to reorganise and address its financial difficulties without the pressure of legal action from creditors.

In contrast, there is no moratorium on insolvent liquidation, meaning creditors are free to initiate procedures to dissolve the company or take other legal enforcement measures to reclaim debts.

This is a significant difference between liquidation and administration, with the moratorium providing valuable protection for struggling businesses in administration vs liquidation.

Director Investigations and Liability

In liquidation, directors may be subject to investigations and potential liabilities for wrongful or fraudulent trading. This means that, in certain cases, directors may be held responsible for any outstanding debts if their actions are determined to be fraudulent or contrary to the company’s interests.

On the other hand, directors are not liable for such investigations or liabilities in company administration. This is another critical difference between the two processes, with company administration offering a less risky path for company directors in terms of personal liability.

Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs)

Company Voluntary Arrangements (CVAs) are proposals made to creditors that outline how the repayment of company debts will be made over a fixed period, generally ranging from three to five years. CVAs can be used in both liquidation processes and administration processes, but the purpose and process differ significantly.

In this section, we will explore the role of CVAs in the liquidation vs administration and administration vs liquidation administration and administration and how they can influence the outcome of each process.

Purpose and Process

In liquidation, a CVA is employed to allow a company to pay its creditors over a specified period, with the company proposing a CVA to its creditors, who must then approve it by a majority vote.

Upon approval, the CVA is legally binding, the new company and the new company name must abide by the terms of the agreement. This can help struggling businesses manage their debts and avoid complete business dissolution.

On the other hand, in administration, a CVA is utilised to enable a company to continue trading. The company can restructure its liabilities and remain in business, potentially avoiding the need for liquidation altogether.

This highlights the versatility of CVAs in addressing financial difficulties and providing tailored solutions for companies in very different outcomes and situations.

Comparing CVAs with Liquidation and Administration

While CVAs share some commonalities with both liquidation and administration, their objectives and outcomes may differ significantly.

In liquidation, a CVA allows the company to repay its debts over a fixed period, while liquidation focuses on selling assets and bringing the company to an end.

In this sense, a CVA can be viewed as a more flexible and potentially less damaging alternative to liquidation.

In contrast, administration seeks to rescue a company and restore it to profitability, with a CVA playing a supportive role in enabling the company to continue trading and address its financial issues.

In this context, CVAs can complement the administration process by providing a means for the company to restructure its liabilities and work towards a successful turnaround.

Deciding Between Liquidation and Administration

Deciding between liquidation and administration is a complex and challenging task, requiring careful evaluation of your company’s situation and seeking expert advice from experienced professionals.

In the following sections, we will explore the key factors to consider when evaluating your company’s circumstances and the importance of obtaining professional guidance to make the right decision for your business.

Evaluating Your Company’s Situation

A thorough analysis of your company’s financial statements, competitive environment, and target market is crucial to understanding its current position and future prospects.

Examining the income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement can provide an overview of the company’s financial health and performance.

Additionally, a SWOT analysis can help identify internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats, giving valuable insights into the company’s competitive position and potential.

When evaluating your company’s competitive environment, consider the presence of competitors, potential new entrants, substitutes, and suppliers to gain a clear understanding of the competitive landscape and how your company can strategically position itself.

Assessing your company’s target market and buyer persona, including demographics, psychographics, and behaviors, can help you understand the needs and wants of your customers and the most effective ways your company or business has to reach them.

Seeking Expert Advice

Obtaining expert advice is essential when deciding between liquidation and administration, as experienced professionals can provide invaluable insights and guidance tailored to your company’s specific needs.

When seeking expert advice, it is important to ensure your questions are articulated in a precise and straightforward manner. Be courteous and respectful when contacting an expert, and be prepared to provide compensation for their services if necessary.

The right insolvency practitioner can offer the most suitable advice and guidance to guarantee the most favorable result for all parties involved.

By carefully considering your company’s situation and seeking expert advice, you can make an informed decision between liquidation and administration, ultimately choosing the path that is best suited to your business’s needs and objectives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Listed below are some of the most common questions regarding liquidation vs administration:

What is the difference between a liquidator and an administrator?

Liquidators are responsible for the dissolution and winding up of a company, while administrators seek to rescue struggling businesses. The former focuses on liquidating a company’s assets and closing the struggling business, to avoid liquidation altogether while the latter works towards reviving the company by restructuring it financially and operationally.

Does a company go into administration before liquidation?

In most cases, a company will go into administration before liquidation occurs, as this provides an opportunity to restructure the debt and finances of the business, or potentially close it in an orderly fashion if insolvency is to avoid liquidation altogether unavoidable.

Administration is a process that can help to protect the interests of a company’s creditors and shareholders, and can also provide a breathing space for the new company to explore options for its future. It is important to note that administration is not a guarantee of success, and the new company itself may still be forced to liquidate if it is not successful.

What are the 3 types of liquidation?

Liquidation is the process of winding up a business and there are three primary types: creditors’ voluntary liquidation, the members voluntary liquidation and’ the members voluntary liquidation and, and compulsory liquidation.

Creditors’ and members’ voluntary liquidations are typically initiated by the business itself, while compulsory liquidation involves a court order to close a company due to insolvency.

Is going into administration the same as insolvency?

Is going into administration the same as formal insolvency procedures going concern an escape insolvency?? No, while an escape insolvency both involve financial difficulty and restructuring, entering administration is an attempt to put financial pressure and save the company, whereas insolvency marks its closure.

Going into administration is an official process with legal protection in order to repay creditors or to give time to the company administration negotiate with creditors, while insolvency simply means that the company can no longer pay its debts.


In conclusion, understanding the main differences between liquidation and administration is essential for company directors facing financial difficulties.

Both processes serve distinct purposes, with liquidation focusing on ending a company and administration striving to save it. Insolvency practitioners play a crucial role in both procedures, and seeking their expert advice is vital for making the right decision for your company.

By carefully evaluating your company’s situation and considering the legal aspects and potential outcomes of each process, you can make an informed decision that will ultimately shape the future of your business.

Remember, the choice between voluntary liquidation, and administration is not a simple one, but with the right guidance and careful consideration, you can navigate this challenging path and work towards a brighter future for your company.

About Insolvency Practitioner

We are Insolvency Practitioners based in Barking who are dedicated to providing expert solutions for financial distress.

Contact Us